From: | "Adam Rich" <adam(dot)r(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves |
Date: | 2009-02-01 04:47:28 |
Message-ID: | 08ae01c98428$300fa620$902ef260$@r@sbcglobal.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:16:17 +0000
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it
> do some things which rub you the wrong way?
I see all the major ones have already been mentioned, so here's some
minor ones.
- lack of system-level and DDL triggers
- inability to limit triggers to certain columns
- inability to know the DML operation causing a trigger
- date_part/extract returning floats instead of integer
- parts of the SQL statement (e.g. 'for update of') requiring table
aliases when present instead of table names.
- lack of queryable high-water marks useful for tuning
- lack of an auto-tuner, for that matter.
- inability to log (e.g. long-running queries) to a table
- lack of custom session-level variables (without editing postgresql.conf)
- lack of autonomous transactions
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Christensen | 2009-02-01 07:30:28 | Need some help converting MS SQL stored proc to postgres function |
Previous Message | Richard Broersma | 2009-02-01 04:04:40 | Re: ALTER TABLE with TYPE serial does not work |