Re: Question on postgresql.conf

From: George Neuner <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question on postgresql.conf
Date: 2018-07-31 18:16:04
Message-ID: 0891md57k2c62v4ipbjgdg3quger08k632@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:59:03 -0500, Dimitri Maziuk
<dmaziuk(at)bmrb(dot)wisc(dot)edu> wrote:

>On 07/31/2018 12:33 PM, George Neuner wrote:
>
>> Is there some reason that postgresql.conf cannot be a link to your
>> file?
>
>It's six of one, half a dozen of the other. The big problem is when the
>network share is unavailable at host boot and all of your databases are
>belong to bitbucket. If you want to do it right, you need chef/puppet as
>already suggested.

I understand the problem with network shares - but the OP mentioned
only a "shared location", which could be just another directory on the
same device. Because the OP said also that there were other DBMS
being used in the same shop, I considered that there might be a
respectable SAN involved.

George

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Maziuk 2018-07-31 18:24:51 Re: Question on postgresql.conf
Previous Message Dimitri Maziuk 2018-07-31 18:15:28 Re: Question on postgresql.conf