Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Date: 2024-05-17 05:05:38
Message-ID: 0886ffae-1e49-4ba9-9231-2d0365be55df@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17.05.24 04:26, Robert Haas wrote:
> I do*emphatically* think we need a parking lot.

People seem to like this idea; I'm not quite sure I follow it. If you
just want the automated patch testing, you can do that on your own by
setting up github/cirrus for your own account. If you keep emailing the
public your patches just because you don't want to set up your private
testing tooling, that seems a bit abusive?

Are there other reasons why developers might want their patches
registered in a parking lot?

We also need to consider that the cfbot/cirrus resources are limited.
Whatever changes we make, we should make sure that they are prioritized
well.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2024-05-17 05:09:12 Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-05-17 04:58:09 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose