From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Donald Fraser" <demolish(at)cwgsy(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgadmin-support] Reverse engineered Column definition incorrect for DEFAULT |
Date: | 2003-10-02 16:51:51 |
Message-ID: | 087201c38905$7aa45e20$1f324d80@w2k |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgadmin-support |
Dear Donald.
Thank you very much.
It will be reflected soon.
Dave Apply it?
----- Original Message -----
From: Donald Fraser
> The reverse engineered code for column definitions if incorrect for DEFAULT values.
> I create table such as:
(snip)
> ALTER TABLE public.tbl_bkgndata ALTER COLUMN id DEFAULT nextval('tbl_bkgndata_id_seq'::text);
>
> Last row should read:
> ALTER TABLE public.tbl_bkgndata ALTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT nextval('tbl_bkgndata_id_seq'::text);
>
> That is the key word SET is missing.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgColumn_patch | application/octet-stream | 674 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2003-10-02 17:33:26 | Re: gcc ignoring defined macros? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-10-02 16:08:28 | Re: wxWindows Upgrade] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-10-02 18:17:21 | Re: Reverse engineered Column definition incorrect |
Previous Message | Donald Fraser | 2003-10-02 15:07:45 | Reverse engineered Column definition incorrect for DEFAULT |