Re: TRUE and true

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRUE and true
Date: 2017-06-22 13:13:56
Message-ID: 08678a07-3967-8567-59e5-b9bcced7f457@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/22/17 07:09, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> What makes us have both TRUE/true or FALSE/false as constants of
> bool?

Historical reasons, probably. I plan to submit a patch to phase out or
remove TRUE/FALSE as part of a migration toward stdbool.h. So I suggest
you use lower case and don't worry about the other ones for now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-06-22 13:36:19 Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-06-22 12:51:14 Re: SQL MERGE patches for PostgreSQL Versions