| From: | "Mindaugas Riauba" <mind(at)bi(dot)lt> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What is the fastest null WHERE |
| Date: | 2003-10-01 13:05:41 |
| Message-ID: | 085401c3881c$bacfaca0$f20214ac@bite.lt |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> > While writing web application I found that it would
> > be very nice for me to have "null" WHERE clause. Like
> > WHERE 1=1. Then it is easy to concat additional
> > conditions just using $query . " AND col=false" syntax.
> >
> > But which of the possible "null" clauses is the fastest
> > one?
>
> I suspect WHERE true, but is it really necessary.
Thanks. I'll use "WHERE true" for now. And of course it is
not necessary it just simplifies code a bit.
> Most languages will have a join() operator that lets you do something
like:
>
> $where_cond = join(' AND ', @list_of_tests)
That's not the case. Test may or may not be performed based on
web form values.
Mindaugas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-01 13:14:32 | Re: inferior SCSI performance |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-10-01 12:51:46 | Re: What is the fastest null WHERE |