From: | Philip Semanchuk <philip(at)americanefficient(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Vijaykumar Jain <vijaykumarjain(dot)github(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE/REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW planner difference? |
Date: | 2021-06-02 12:39:33 |
Message-ID: | 083DF3BE-BD4D-411B-956A-3BBF7448D688@americanefficient.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Jun 1, 2021, at 3:23 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:15 AM Vijaykumar Jain
> <vijaykumarjain(dot)github(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> i only get workers to create mv, but refresh mv plan does not use workers for the same conf params.
>
> Yeah, this changed in v14:
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=9e7ccd9ef64d05e87ceb1985d459bef9031205c0
Thanks, all! It’s great to have a clear explanation. I looked at the change notes for 12 & 13 before I posted. I didn’t occur to me to look at 14. :-)
Cheers
Philip
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | gerry gan | 2021-06-03 01:34:46 | Re: Is consistent (deterministic) ordering possible in our case? |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-06-02 08:43:42 | Re: Internationalisation (i18n) with Postgres as backend |