| From: | "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: connection timeouts and "killing" users |
| Date: | 2008-09-12 02:09:55 |
| Message-ID: | 0836165E8EE50F40A3DD8F0D87137267010B109A@azsmsx421.amr.corp.intel.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
OK, killing the remote users is fine. Just want ot make sure I'm not
killing some sort of shared remote server process(es) that would prevent
future remotes to connect.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:35 PM
To: Gauthier, Dave
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] connection timeouts and "killing" users
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Gauthier, Dave
<dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> wrote:
>
> How do I get the pids? Is there something specific I should look for
in the
> executable name I can see in "ps"?
You can either use a combination of ps and grep:
ps ax|grep postgres|grep dbname
or use the pg_stat_activity table;
> Will I break any remote server processes which are handeling remote
> attaches if I do this?
Yes, they would lose their connection. It's a choice you don't have
anymore if you're renaming databases underneath them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Artacus | 2008-09-12 02:50:48 | Re: declare column update expression |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-09-12 01:09:51 | Re: external query VS user function |