Re: Buildfarm animal caiman showing a plperl test issue with newer Perl versions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm animal caiman showing a plperl test issue with newer Perl versions
Date: 2024-06-26 11:35:24
Message-ID: 083182c9-bd95-415b-9468-41d40abe9d52@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2024-06-24 Mo 6:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2024-06-24 Mo 12:00 AM, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>> Hello hackers,
>>
>> As recent caiman failures ([1], [2], ...) show, plperl.sql is
>> incompatible
>> with Perl 5.40. (The last successful test runs took place when cayman
>> had Perl 5.38.2 installed: [3].)
>>
>> FWIW, I've found an already-existing fix for the issue [4] and a note
>> describing the change for Perl 5.39.10 [5].
>>
>> [1]
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=caiman&dt=2024-06-24%2001%3A34%3A23
>> [2]
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=caiman&dt=2024-06-24%2000%3A15%3A16
>> [3]
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=caiman&dt=2024-05-02%2021%3A57%3A17
>> [4]
>> https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports/tree/community/postgresql14/fix-test-plperl-5.8-pragma.patch?id=28aeb872811f59a7f646aa29ed7c9dc30e698e65
>> [5]
>> https://metacpan.org/release/PEVANS/perl-5.39.10/changes#Selected-Bug-Fixes
>>
>>
>
> It's a very odd bug. I guess we should just backpatch the removal of
> that redundant version check in plc_perlboot.pl, probably all the way
> down to 9.2 since godwit builds and tests with plperl that far back,
> and some day in the not too distant future it will upgrade to perl 5.40.
>
>
>

Done.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-06-26 11:54:42 Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-06-26 11:27:17 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication