Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date: 2023-03-28 17:52:33
Message-ID: 081a829dfe4859aae3d4dffb9cc33894fde33e31.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 00:17 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> The other patch you posted seems like it makes a lot of progress in
> that direction, and I think that should go in first. That was one of
> the items I suggested previously[2], so thank you for working on
> that.

The above is not a hard objection.

I still hold the opinion that the non-superuser subscriptions work is
feels premature without the apply-as-table-owner work. It would be
great if the other patch ends up ready quickly, which would moot the
commit-ordering question.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-03-28 17:55:38 Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2023-03-28 17:44:28 Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication