From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Date: | 2023-03-28 17:52:33 |
Message-ID: | 081a829dfe4859aae3d4dffb9cc33894fde33e31.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 00:17 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> The other patch you posted seems like it makes a lot of progress in
> that direction, and I think that should go in first. That was one of
> the items I suggested previously[2], so thank you for working on
> that.
The above is not a hard objection.
I still hold the opinion that the non-superuser subscriptions work is
feels premature without the apply-as-table-owner work. It would be
great if the other patch ends up ready quickly, which would moot the
commit-ordering question.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-03-28 17:55:38 | Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2023-03-28 17:44:28 | Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |