Re: 2023-08-10 release announcement draft

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2023-08-10 release announcement draft
Date: 2023-08-08 01:49:26
Message-ID: 07de16ad-449b-120e-3e8a-596fb022104b@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/7/23 9:45 PM, David Rowley wrote:

>> * Fix a performance regression when running concurrent
>> [`COPY`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-copy.html) statements on a
>> single table.
>
> I think this is still outstanding. A bit of work has been done for the
> int parsing regression but it seems there's still a performance
> regression when running multiple COPYs on the same table, per [1].

Hm, the open item was closed[1] -- was that premature, or is this a new
issue (have not yet read the thread you referenced)?

>> or an previous major version of PostgreSQL, you will need to use a strategy
>
> "a previous".

Thanks for the catch -- fixed locally.

Jonathan

[1]
https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items#resolved_before_16beta3

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-08-08 01:53:30 Re: 2023-08-10 release announcement draft
Previous Message David Rowley 2023-08-08 01:45:13 Re: 2023-08-10 release announcement draft