| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
| Date: | 2023-03-27 19:21:15 |
| Message-ID: | 07a4e680c44187539a1f4d0767270477d8145cd0.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2023-03-27 at 10:46 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > There are some big issues, like the security model for replaying
> > changes.
>
> That seems largely unrelated.
They are self-evidently related in a fundamental way. The behavior of
the non-superuser-subscription patch depends on the presence of the
apply-as-table-owner patch.
I think I'd like to understand the apply-as-table-owner patch better to
understand the interaction.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-03-27 20:17:32 | Re: pgsql: amcheck: Fix verify_heapam for tuples where xmin or xmax is 0. |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-03-27 19:04:20 | Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner |