rollback vs. commit for closing read-only transaction

From: "David Parker" <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com>
To: "postgres general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: rollback vs. commit for closing read-only transaction
Date: 2005-04-25 21:43:40
Message-ID: 07FDEE0ED7455A48AC42AC2070EDFF7C67EBDF@corpsrv2.tazznetworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

If an application transaction is known to be read-only, is there any
reason to prefer COMMIT or ROLLBACK for closing that transaction? Would
there be any performance difference between the two commands?

- DAP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
David Parker Tazz Networks (401) 709-5130


Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-25 22:00:59 Re: rollback vs. commit for closing read-only transaction
Previous Message John DeSoi 2005-04-25 20:13:01 Re: plpgsql function not working