Re: CREATE TABLE with parallel workers, 10.0?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Joshua Chamberlain <josh(at)zephyri(dot)co>,"pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE with parallel workers, 10.0?
Date: 2017-02-16 01:22:05
Message-ID: 07B60ABA-80AE-4EC4-AF12-CDE748497508@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On February 15, 2017 5:20:20 PM PST, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>In many cases, I expect this would work just as well, if not better,
>than trying to actually do writes in parallel.

Why? IPCing tuples around is quite expensive. Or do you mean because it'll be more suitable because of the possible plans?

Andres

Andres

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-02-16 01:28:43 Re: CREATE TABLE with parallel workers, 10.0?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-02-16 01:20:20 Re: CREATE TABLE with parallel workers, 10.0?