| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test |
| Date: | 2024-05-03 12:27:40 |
| Message-ID: | 07982fd7-e9a8-4aff-aa02-efcb0dd6402f@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29.04.24 07:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Up to now, we've only worried about whether tests running in parallel
> within a single test suite can interact. It's quite scary to think
> that the meson setup has expanded the possibility of interactions
> to our entire source tree. Maybe that was a bad idea and we should
> fix the meson infrastructure to not do that. I fear that otherwise,
> we'll get bit regularly by very-low-probability bugs of this kind.
I don't think there is anything fundamentally different in the
parallelism setups of the make-based and the meson-based tests. There
are just different implementation details that might affect the likely
orderings and groupings.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-05-03 12:49:38 | Re: Reducing the log spam |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-05-03 12:20:21 | Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation |