Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date: 2023-01-30 10:42:12
Message-ID: 0779acdd-7b9a-5b8a-dd6b-f7b4f650e8d5@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30.01.23 07:12, Peter Smith wrote:
> Meanwhile, this pagination topic has strayed far away from the
> original $SUBJECT, so I guess since there is nothing else pending this
> thread's CF entry [1] can just be marked as "Committed" now?

done

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-30 10:46:06 Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-01-30 10:39:30 Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl