Re: Wait event that should be reported while waiting for WAL archiving to finish

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wait event that should be reported while waiting for WAL archiving to finish
Date: 2020-03-23 06:56:20
Message-ID: 076e0f70-5b70-adb7-b692-47308842925c@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/03/19 19:39, Atsushi Torikoshi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:19 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com <mailto:masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> I have no idea about this. But I wonder how much that change
> is helpful to reduce the power consumption because waiting
> for WAL archive during the backup basically not so frequently
> happens.
>
>
> +1.
> And as far as I reviewed the patch,  I didn't find any problems.

Thanks for the review!
Barring any objection, I will commit this patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-03-23 07:06:46 Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-03-23 06:55:34 Re: Internal key management system