Re: Missing Trigger after pgdump install

From: Susan Hurst <susan(dot)hurst(at)brookhurstdata(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing Trigger after pgdump install
Date: 2019-08-16 22:45:06
Message-ID: 075cabbaff9591811d6ed04c4c099f2a@mail.brookhurstdata.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

We're using the 9.5.14 in the sandbox to extract data and objects from
the pgdump that was created in the 9.5.0 version. Hope I answered your
question correctly. If not, let me know and I'll try again.

Our biggest concern is that there may be other silent issues that we
have not yet discovered. Thanks for the info you just provided, Adrian.
We'll read up on the path settings to see if we can find an answer
there.

Sue

---
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Susan E Hurst
Principal Consultant
Brookhurst Data LLC
Email: susan(dot)hurst(at)brookhurstdata(dot)com
Mobile: 314-486-3261

On 2019-08-16 17:29, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 8/16/19 3:18 PM, Susan Hurst wrote:
>> Production version:
>> PostgreSQL 9.5.0 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7
>> 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-16), 64-bit
>>
>> Sandbox version:
>> "PostgreSQL 9.5.14, compiled by Visual C++ build 1800, 64-bit"
>>
>
> I going to say it has something to do with this:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/release-9-5-12.html
>
> "Avoid use of insecure search_path settings in pg_dump and other
> client programs (Noah Misch, Tom Lane)"
>
> Are you using the 9.5.0 or 9.5.14 version of pg_dump to dump from the
> production server?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Sargent 2019-08-16 22:59:58 Re: Missing Trigger after pgdump install
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2019-08-16 22:29:44 Re: Missing Trigger after pgdump install