| From: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation |
| Date: | 2023-06-30 17:32:50 |
| Message-ID: | 073e95fa-8413-8afd-3eba-01aea47198f7@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 6/30/23 5:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> After taking another look at this, I wonder if it'd be better to fail as
>> soon as we see the database or user name is too long instead of lugging
>> them around when authentication is destined to fail.
>
> If we're agreed that we aren't going to truncate these identifiers,
> that seems like a reasonable way to handle it.
>
Yeah agree, thanks Nathan for the idea.
I'll work on a new patch version proposal.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Christensen | 2023-06-30 17:35:09 | Initdb-time block size specification |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-30 16:47:10 | Re: SPI isolation changes |