From: | "Lance Obermeyer" <LObermey(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement |
Date: | 2005-01-11 06:23:11 |
Message-ID: | 072BDB2B234F3840B0AC03411084C9AF46B3F6@ausmail2k2.aus.pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
I hesitate to post this, since it is well travel ground, but...
This is a very black and white issue. "PostgreSQL" is a registered trademark that I do not have a license to use.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
Sent: Mon 1/10/2005 5:33 PM
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement
Josh Berkus wrote:
> By now, you may have seen the news announcement around Pervasive
> starting a supported version of PostgreSQL.
> http://www.pervasivepostgres.com/
I think they should start by deciding on a spelling of their (and our)
product.
And then they should stop marking it as a trademark.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-01-11 07:20:29 | Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-01-11 04:32:11 | Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement |