From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | a(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ivan Panchenko <wao(at)mail(dot)ru>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: On login trigger: take three |
Date: | 2022-03-28 21:36:39 |
Message-ID: | 071FF6A8-764C-41E7-B55A-4DB6BD6DF913@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 28 Mar 2022, at 23:31, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-03-28 23:27:56 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 28 Mar 2022, at 19:10, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> On 2022-03-28 15:57:37 +0300, a(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru wrote:
>>
>>>> + data initialization. It is vital that any event trigger using the
>>>> + <literal>login</literal> event checks whether or not the database is in
>>>> + recovery.
>>>>
>>>> Does any trigger really have to contain a pg_is_in_recovery() call?
>>>
>>> Not *any* trigger, just any trigger that writes.
>>
>> Thats correct, the docs should be updated with something like the below I
>> reckon.
>>
>> It is vital that event trigger using the <literal>login</literal> event
>> which has side-effects checks whether or not the database is in recovery to
>> ensure they are not performing modifications to hot standby nodes.
>
> Maybe side-effects is a bit too general? Emitting a log message, rejecting a
> login, setting some GUCs, etc are all side-effects too.
Good point, it needs to say that modifications that cause WAL to be generated
are prohibited, but in a more user-friendly readable way. Perhaps in a big red
warning box.
>>>> In this message
>>>> (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220312024652.lvgehszwke4hhove%40alap3.anarazel.de)
>>>> it was only about triggers on hot standby, which run not read-only queries
>>>
>>> The problem precisely is that the login triggers run on hot standby nodes, and
>>> that if they do writes, you can't login anymore.
>>
>> Do you think this potential foot-gun is scary enough to reject this patch?
>> There are lots of creative ways to cause Nagios alerts from ones database, but
>> this has the potential to do so with a small bug in userland code. Still, I
>> kind of like the feature so I'm indecisive.
>
> It does seem like a huge footgun. But also kinda useful. So I'm really +-0.
Looks like we are in agreement here. I'm going to go over it again and sleep
on it some more before the deadline hits.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-28 21:39:31 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c (zstd workers) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-28 21:31:25 | Re: On login trigger: take three |