From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
Date: | 2021-10-11 16:53:45 |
Message-ID: | 07159C9A-40DA-47BF-B2F4-203F5AC00890@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> On Oct 6, 2021, at 4:12 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, excellent, that was probably the only thing that had me really hung up. I thought you were still asking for pg_amcheck to filter out the --parent-check option when in recovery, but if you're not asking for that, then I might have enough to go on now.
>
> Sorry about that. I realized my mistake (not specifically addressing
> pg_is_in_recovery()) after I hit "send", and should have corrected the
> record sooner.
>
>> I was using "downgrading" to mean downgrading from bt_index_parent_check() to bt_index_check() when pg_is_in_recovery() is true, but you've clarified that you're not requesting that downgrade, so I think we've now gotten past the last sticking point about that whole issue.
>
> Right. I never meant anything like making a would-be
> bt_index_parent_check() call into a bt_index_check() call, just
> because of the state of the system (e.g., it's in recovery). That
> seems awful, in fact.
Please find attached the latest version of the patch which includes the changes we discussed.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Fix-BUG-17212.patch | application/octet-stream | 19.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-11 17:10:25 | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2021-10-11 16:17:39 | BUG #17221: Data sending resume |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-10-11 16:56:34 | Re: storing an explicit nonce |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-11 16:37:51 | Re: Corruption with IMMUTABLE functions in index expression. |