Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
Date: 2025-04-04 15:23:35
Message-ID: 06ebbd51-217a-4cbc-970a-d8960b0f79ed@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 4/4/25 08:09, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2025, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
>> On 4/4/25 06:13, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>>>  On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>  Bug? This happened on a postgres compiled from last week's master
>>> branch.
>>
>> Are you talking about the dev version?
>
> In this thread, yes. My mistake I didn't mention it from the start. I
> compiled it in order to see if the problems I mentioned in my previous
> thread were fixed.

Since it still has not established that an actual problem exists in
previous versions, this is premature. Especially as dev has not even
reached alpha AFAIK.

To get at a solution more detailed information is needed. I would also
suggest testing using something less the 1000 large partitions.

Information needed for any given report:

1) Postgres version being dumped from.

2) The complete pg_dump command.

3) The Postgres version being restored to.

4) The complete pg_restore command.

5) The error messages.

Also have you tried a schema only dump/restore?

>
>
> Dimitris
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2025-04-04 16:45:25 Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
Previous Message Dimitrios Apostolou 2025-04-04 15:09:14 Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table