Re: Questions about SERIAL type

From: "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>
To: "Tony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu>, "Doug McNaught" <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions about SERIAL type
Date: 2001-12-01 18:38:15
Message-ID: 06da01c17a98$57d55160$5dd9fea9@gunn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

----- Original Message -----
From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:31 PM

> > I figure that I should never reach 2^31 - 1 transaction per table even
> > with many aborted ones; however, I think these would be nice changes.
>
> What's going to happen AFAIK is that 64-bit sequences will be
> available. It's unlikely that overflow will be an issue with
> those... ;)

"640K ought to be enough for everyone!"
Gill Bates.

No offense, just an association :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-01 19:24:32 My machine is down
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-01 17:25:37 Re: Second call for platform testing