Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, "Koshi Shibagaki (Fujitsu)" <shibagaki(dot)koshi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL
Date: 2024-11-21 19:06:11
Message-ID: 06a76628-6791-4e23-b7ca-33d0c768c08c@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/19/24 18:12, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:30 PM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> Any other opinions out there?
>
> Why should we accept your patch (which adds a legacy_crypto_enabled
> GUC) instead of adopting the approach originally proposed (i.e. use
> the OpenSSL version of the functions)?

Because that idea was rejected earlier in the thread by multiple people
other than me?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2024-11-21 19:11:24 Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2024-11-21 18:51:12 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER