On Jan 5, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>
> Upon reading the DFSG, it seems you have a point...
> However...
> QuickLZ is dual licensed:
> a. Royalty-free-perpetuous-use as part of the PostgreSQL backend or
> any derived works of PostgreSQL which link in *at least* 50% of the
> original PostgreSQL codebase.
How does one even define "50% of the original PostgreSQL codebase"?
What nonsense.
-M