| From: | Albert Vernon Smith <contact1(at)absentia(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: query plan in pg7.4 vs 8.0.3 |
| Date: | 2005-06-17 14:47:14 |
| Message-ID: | 0648A975-5EB0-47DE-8D40-FBD1C8BEB9F8@absentia.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I just re-checked, and all the same index definitions are on both
tables.
Cheers,
-albert
On 17.6.2005, at 14:20, Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Vernon Smith <contact1(at)absentia(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I am in process of migrating a database from Pg 7.4.3 to Pg 8.0.3. I
>> dumped and reloaded the data, and things look good, until I try to
>> work with it. When I try to make a query to a view based on a large
>> join (select * from 'view' limit 10), the 7.4.3 query works very
>> well, and the indexes are being used well. But, when I go to 8.0.3,
>> there are some very costly joins, and the query is not workable.
>>
>
> Are you sure you have all the same indexes in the 8.0 database? It
> looks like one might be missing on assay2rs.assay_id.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Love | 2005-06-17 14:52:34 | Re: Backing up multiple databases |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-06-17 14:35:48 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |