Re: command.c breakup

Sounds fair. I'd have brought it up earlier but was away last week.

The changes I made are very straight forward and easy enough to redo.
--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice
how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt
otherwise.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Gray" <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>; "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>; "Hackers"
<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] command.c breakup

> On Sun, 2002-04-14 at 21:30, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > I'm not exactly sure what you're touching, but could it wait for
the
> > below pg_depend patch to be either accepted or rejected? It
lightly
> > fiddles with a number of files in the command and catalog
directories.
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2002-04/msg00050.php
> >
>
> Well, I'm working on it now and it's about 75% done. I hope to post
the
> patch within the next few hours. I'm sorry that I wasn't aware of
your
> patch -but commands/ is a busy place at present :). I've scanned
your
> patch very briefly and the major impacts I can see are:
>
> 1) The ALTER TABLE code will be in tablecmds.c (but exactly the same
> code as at present)
>
> 2) The type support will be in typecmds.c (define.c and remove.c are
> essentially gone -the define and remove commands for foo are in
general
> now together in foocmds.c
>
> I'm not touching anything in the catalog directory.
>
> Note that as I'm only shuffling code from one file to another, your
> patch shouldn't need much modification to get it working
afterwards -
> although there is an intention to tidy up common code in the
commands/
> directory as a second phase, this will consist of more "ordinary"
> patches...
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
>