| From: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "John Gray" <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: command.c breakup |
| Date: | 2002-04-14 20:30:23 |
| Message-ID: | 063201c1e3f3$34dde540$8001a8c0@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm not exactly sure what you're touching, but could it wait for the
below pg_depend patch to be either accepted or rejected? It lightly
fiddles with a number of files in the command and catalog directories.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2002-04/msg00050.php
> > That shouldn't be too much of a problem in the next couple of
weeks - if
> > we can decide on a specific day I'll book it into my diary (Any
day but
> > Wednesday next week would be fine for me).
>
> I will try to have no uncommitted changes over this weekend; that
will
> give you a clear field Monday morning, or you can start on the
weekend
> if you like. Sound good?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2002-04-14 20:39:32 | Re: experimental pg_qcache patch |
| Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2002-04-14 20:13:17 | Re: experimental pg_qcache patch |