Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE

From: Sferacarta Software <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it>
To: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE
Date: 1998-12-09 14:05:49
Message-ID: 0629.981209@bo.nettuno.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Vadim,

sabato, 5 dicembre 98, you wrote:

VM> Sferacarta Software wrote:
>>
>> >> Seems that I found a bug on HAVING clause, see attached file.
>> >>
>>
>> VM> Could you post me data for 8342 rows ?
>>
>> I think this bug is not on HAVING but on IN/ANY/ALL, I tried all these

VM> This is bug on handling HAVING in subqueries.
VM> There was no HAVING when I was implementing subqueries and
VM> so I didn't care... The bug is in optimizer:

Well in such case I can send you my 8342 rows if you want it still.

-Jose'-

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1998-12-09 14:11:17 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling with egcs 1.1.1
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 1998-12-09 13:59:20 AW: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t