Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft
Date: 2020-05-21 11:44:02
Message-ID: 0624cdd9-14fe-35c3-348f-448d7102e3f2@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi John,

On 5/21/20 12:12 AM, John Naylor wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I noticed a couple minor inconsistencies:
>
> ".datetime" -> elsewhere functions are formatted as `.datetime()`
>
> libpq -> `libpq`
>
> The link to the release notes on its own line is the same as the
> inline link, if that makes sense. In other places with links on their
> own line, the full URL is in the link text.
>
> Also, for "indexes that contain many repeat values", "repeated" might
> sound better here. It's one of those things that jumped out at me at
> first reading, but when trying both in my head, it seems ok.
>
> Regarding "streaming `pg_basebackup`s", I'm used to the general term
> "base backups" in this usage, which seems a distinct concept from the
> name of the invoked command.

Thanks for the suggestions. I ended up incorporating all of them.

Stay tuned for the release...

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-05-21 12:49:57 Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-05-21 11:37:29 Re: [bug] Table not have typarray when created by single user mode