Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica
Date: 2021-02-15 16:03:17
Message-ID: 061BEE02-EA45-4ED5-A9CB-2015D133CA2B@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Feb 15, 2021, at 07:47, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> So my guess would be that the difference between primary and standby is not that a
> different number of multixacts are created, but that you need to read them on
> the standby and not on the primary.

Why does the secondary need to read them? Visibility?
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2021-02-15 16:12:30 ADD FOREIGN KEY fails, but the records exist
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2021-02-15 15:47:39 Re: MultiXactMemberControlLock contention on a replica