Re[2]: [HACKERS] gram.y

From: Sferacarta Software <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re[2]: [HACKERS] gram.y
Date: 1998-12-10 13:31:59
Message-ID: 0605.981210@bo.nettuno.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Thomas,

domenica, 6 dicembre 98, you wrote:

>> I'm trying to make parser recognize SELECTs between parenthesis.
>> I need to do this work to have m$access working with PostgreSQL.
>> The micro$oft access jet (great wisdom) translates the UNIONs as:
>> (SELECT ...) UNION (SELECT ...)

TGL> OK, just assume I have mentioned that you should ask M$ to support
TGL> standard syntax. It isn't entirely clear from the BNF definition of
TGL> SQL92 (parens near SELECT are allowed in some places), but I was hard
TGL> pressed to see where this was legal syntax.

The problem is: I can't say this syntax is illegal, I can't find
nothing about it on SQL documentation.

Any way. I think it would be interesting to have parser recognize every
statement enclosed into parens.
I have also Informix-SE on my Linux box, I tried statements enclosed
into parens and Informix understand it.

-Jose'-

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sferacarta Software 1998-12-10 13:41:17 Re[2]: AW: [HACKERS] isnull() or is it?t
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-12-10 09:05:00 Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements