| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | "Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dump CLUSTER in pg_dump |
| Date: | 2003-02-28 02:03:44 |
| Message-ID: | 060101c2decd$9faf6850$6500a8c0@fhp.internal |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> > One possible improvement would be to sort clustered indexes first and
dump
> > them first, that way the cluster operation does not have to do so much
> > reindexing.
>
> Is this really a good idea? I think the clustering itself should be
> done later and manually by the DBA, and the dump should only include a
> command to set the indisclustered bit appropiately. What about
> inventing a command to only set the bit, maybe
No, it's not - but it's the _only_ way of doing it for 7.3.x pg_dump...
> ALTER TABLE <tablename> CLUSTER ON <indexname>
>
> or something like that? I can do that if people thinks it's a good
> idea.
That's exactly what Tom's idea was - I like that particular syntax though.
It's slightly weird I guess to have the two different syntaxes I guess.
I'll add it to my list :)
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-02-28 03:28:44 | psql re-work |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-02-27 19:44:53 | Re: Dump CLUSTER in pg_dump |