Re: MERGE/SPLIT partition commands should create new partitions in the parent's tablespace?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MERGE/SPLIT partition commands should create new partitions in the parent's tablespace?
Date: 2024-07-15 04:33:33
Message-ID: 05fa8162-24a4-405a-b523-128629febf93@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024/07/12 21:17, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:14 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2024/07/10 22:35, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> BTW the new regression tests don't check the table and index names.
>>> Isn't it better to show table and index names for better
>>> diagnosability?
>>
>> Sounds good to me. I've updated the patch as suggested.
>> Please see the attached patch.
>>
>
> Thank you for updating the patch! LGTM.

Thanks for reviewing the patch! I've pushed it.

However, some buildfarm members reported errors, so I'll investigate further.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-07-15 04:55:39 Re: Fix a comment error in logicalrep_write_typ()
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-07-15 03:44:48 Re: race condition when writing pg_control