| From: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Fernando Nasser" <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Domain Support -- another round |
| Date: | 2002-03-21 15:42:18 |
| Message-ID: | 05ef01c1d0ee$fc70a880$5302000a@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > Not entirely sure, except the book I had (SQL99 Complete, Really)
> > specifically forbids it.
> >
>
> Yes, but this is their interpretation of the standard. There is an
Understood. It's the best that I had on me.
I've not found a cheap resource for the real one. Ie. priced suitably
to fit a hobby project :)
> error in that page anyway, as the standard explicitly forbids
> arrays and UDTs and they list REF and ARRAY as valid data types.
> (they also get confused with SESSION_USER and CURENT_USER on page
> 281, so it does not surprise me).
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-03-21 16:10:08 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |
| Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-03-21 15:32:19 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ferdinand Smit | 2002-03-21 15:53:30 | Re: pg_dump and transactions |
| Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2002-03-21 15:32:19 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |