From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks |
Date: | 2003-02-11 14:36:40 |
Message-ID: | 05dc8333c30f9e46282486f13f6b968b@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Hrm. I just saw that the PHP ADODB guy just published a bunch of database
> benchmarks. It's fairly evident to me that benchmarking PostgreSQL on
> Win32 isn't really fair:
>
> http://php.weblogs.com/oracle_mysql_performance
Is there anyone here that can contact them and get more details about
how the test was run? Even on Windows, I don't beleive that Postgres
should be quite as slow as indicated. I'd rather someone more familiar
with Windows than I take a stab at it.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200302110934
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+SQoFvJuQZxSWSsgRAi5jAJ4li+qUDlxzM1r0XLZAjDlW1oA1ZwCgiOpT
0LgCKy9W5vG0nNcYWNJGkPM=
=Rrw5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2003-02-11 14:39:38 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks |
Previous Message | Mario Weilguni | 2003-02-11 14:31:06 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-02-11 14:38:53 | Re: log_duration |
Previous Message | Mario Weilguni | 2003-02-11 14:31:06 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks |