Re: drop postmaster symlink

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: drop postmaster symlink
Date: 2023-01-12 19:11:09
Message-ID: 05cd2e78dd3b7142f16fd7f14b1694c3520af345.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 13:35 -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
> To be clear, I am completely in agreement with you about removing the
> symlink. I just wanted to be sure Devrim was alerted because I knew
> he had a strong opinion on this topic ;-)

Red Hat's own packages, thus their users may be unhappy about that,
too. They also call postmaster directly.

Regsards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-01-12 19:22:14 Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation
Previous Message mahendrakar s 2023-01-12 19:08:35 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER