From: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: svr2/unionfs |
Date: | 2005-11-29 17:37:36 |
Message-ID: | 05F57348-FAF5-4085-B0A2-D74CC7D0CA39@ehpg.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Of course. I believe this is on the same subnet:
65.19.161.70/255.255.255.128/gw 65.191.61.1
Gavin
On Nov 29, 2005, at 8:52 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
>> Sent: 29 November 2005 16:48
>> To: Dave Page
>> Cc: Magnus Hagander; Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: RE: svr2/unionfs
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, that's a good point. Marc; any idea how long the
>> downtime is likely
>>> to be? I'm not sure what the best way to redirect the
>> clients will be
>>> unless we temporarily write a static version of the few
>> hundred or so
>>> mirror selection pages.
>>
>> So, why not just create a second wwwmaster, that is
>> templateless ... we'll
>> call it wwwmaster2.postgresql.org for testing purposes ...
>> then, once we
>> know its all working, we shutdown the old and restart the new was
>> wwwmaster?
>
> That's a good idea, except it'll take a fair bit of setup I
> imagine. Can
> we just copy svr2 over a copy of the template and bring that up as
> wwwmaster2 for testing? I don't think we need to worry about cleanly
> installing the VM at this stage, just eliminating the unionfs.
>
> Gavin - any chance we can temporarily get an additional IP address if
> that's a possibility?
>
> Regards, Dave
Gavin M. Roy
800 Pound Gorilla
gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-11-29 20:39:38 | Re: Downloads section |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-11-29 16:52:51 | Re: svr2/unionfs |