Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying

From: David Costa <geeks(at)dotgeek(dot)org>
To: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: Jacob Hanson <jacdx(at)jacobhanson(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying
Date: 2004-04-06 08:18:45
Message-ID: 05B84CF0-87A3-11D8-8E74-000A95EB456A@dotgeek.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


On Apr 5, 2004, at 8:00 PM, Dan Langille wrote:

>>
>>
>> Article discussing PHP5 says SQLite is "typically faster than MySQL,
>> significantly faster than PostgreSQL". While I don't doubt it's
>> faster at what it does (with it's small, focused feature-set), the
>> article perpuates the 'Postgres is slow' and 'MySQL is much faster
>> than Postgres' thinking that is no longer accurate.
>
> I can confirm that SQLite is faster than either MySQL or PostgreSQL
> when
> using Bacula. I'm working on improving the PostgreSQL.

Hi Dan!
I am sure SQLite can be faster, but its not comparable with either
MySQL or PostgreSQL
so is this text based "db" http://txtsql.sourceforge.net/

I do have SQLite actively used in a number of sites (e.g.
collegelinux.org) and frankly,
for an end user standpoint specially of a size that might be interested
in SQLite, there is really
no humanly noticeable speed difference IMHO.

When you talk about speed the average PHP developer is thinking about
his guestbook or forum becoming slower with Pgsql
and this is not true ;)

Thanks
David

>
> --
> Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Costa 2004-04-06 08:19:33 Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying
Previous Message David Costa 2004-04-06 08:13:25 Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying