Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age
Date: 2021-10-12 06:45:23
Message-ID: 056c2150c6aed337c3ea7dfe3c57cb74e0399b54.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 08:22 +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter,
> I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum).
> Please consider this patch for a fix.

It is good to be consistent, but the name of the link is not essential, is it?
Changing it might break existing outside links.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Luzanov 2021-10-12 08:29:27 Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2021-10-12 06:43:34 Re: small patch