From: | Filipe Pina <filipe(dot)pina(at)impactzero(dot)pt> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: serialization failure why? |
Date: | 2015-06-18 10:36:49 |
Message-ID: | 054E6D47-15C0-405F-91E7-C9B6BC6316CE@impactzero.pt |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Kevin, assuming you will have some time to confirm that it has been fixed in some version some time next week, I’ve compiled the test steps in http://pastebin.com/4Uqc2kPv <http://pastebin.com/4Uqc2kPv>
Thanks once again
> On 17/06/2015, at 14:40, Filipe Pina <filipe(dot)pina(at)impactzero(dot)pt> wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I have installed:
> PostgreSQL 9.3.7 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2, 64-bit
>
> But as you mentioned it should have been fixed in later versions, I've upgraded to 9.4:
> PostgreSQL 9.4.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2, 64-bit
>
> Though I still get the failures on 9.4.4..
>
> On Qua, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:52 , Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Filipe Pina <filipe(dot)pina(at)impactzero(dot)pt> wrote:
>>
>> if drop the foreign key constraint on stuff_ext table there are
>> no failures at all…
>>
>> It is my recollection that we were excluding the queries used to
>> enforce referential integrity constraints from the conflict
>> tracking, so I am surprised you are seeing this. What is the exact
>> version you are using (as reported by the version() function)?
>>
>> I am at a conference this week, away from my normal development
>> environment; but I will take a look next week.
>>
>> Kevin Grittner
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moran | 2015-06-18 10:37:13 | Re: Select query regarding info |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2015-06-18 09:48:18 | Re: My postgres is not logging anymore |