Re: [pgAdmin III] #48: adminpack shouldn't ask for a specific format of the log_filename

From: "pgAdmin Trac" <trac(at)code(dot)pgadmin(dot)org>
To:
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin III] #48: adminpack shouldn't ask for a specific format of the log_filename
Date: 2009-09-29 10:59:47
Message-ID: 054.9ebb992ecdc3a62b2d61fc4604dec8c4@code.pgadmin.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

#48: adminpack shouldn't ask for a specific format of the log_filename
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: gleu | Owner: dpage
Type: feature | Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: pgadmin | Version: 1.8
Resolution: won't fix | Keywords: adminpack
Platform: all |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dpage):

* status: new => closed
* resolution: => won't fix

Comment:

Adminpack is a PostgreSQL contrib module, and issues should really be
reported/discussed there.

The reason for the format is to restrict the pg_logdir_ls output to only
postgresql logfiles, when they may be present in directories used for
other logs (consider /var/log). Constructing a filter based on a custom
log_filename GUC is actually pretty hard to do.

--
Ticket URL: <http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/48#comment:1>
pgAdmin III <http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/>
pgAdmin III

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message svn 2009-09-29 11:22:21 SVN Commit by dpage: r8049 - trunk/pgadmin3
Previous Message pgAdmin Trac 2009-09-29 10:54:10 Re: [pgAdmin III] #46: "Use Replication" label/field bug in Column Create/Edit Dialog