From: | "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PgSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump in a production environment |
Date: | 2005-05-24 04:25:35 |
Message-ID: | 050730A1-FF7E-4BC5-B2A9-139B2790E9E7@sitening.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Actually, I would find this to be an interesting project, but we're
on the verge of moving to 8.0 via Slony and will have a replicated
cluster, reducing the need for live dumps on the primary read/write
database.
It's too bad round tuits are so expensive!
I was trying to think of a way today in which pg_dump might be able
to use statistics in almost the opposite way of pg_autovacuum, such
that it steered clear of objects in heavy use, but I'm not familiar
enough with the source to know how this might work.
-tfo
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC
Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™
http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-260-0005
On May 23, 2005, at 11:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I'd like to use pg_dump to grab a live backup and, based on the
>> documentation, this would seem to be a realistic possibility. When I
>> try, though, during business hours, when people are frequently
>> logging in and otherwise using the application, the application
>> becomes almost unusable (to the point where logins take on the order
>> of minutes).
>>
>
> The pg_dump sources contain some comments about throttling the rate
> at which data is pulled from the server, with a statement that this
> idea was discussed during July 2000 and eventually dropped. Perhaps
> you can think of a better implementation.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Surabhi Ahuja | 2005-05-24 05:13:25 | bigserial coloumn |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-24 04:12:35 | Re: pg_dump in a production environment |