From: | "Ned Lilly" <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | MySQL and RHDB news; 8.0 troll |
Date: | 2003-04-14 16:09:00 |
Message-ID: | 050001c302a0$2b2bcea0$6402a8c0@Ned |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Some interesting MySQL news here:
http://news.com.com/2100-1012-996434.html
... and for those who weren't aware, this from Patrick Macdonald on the RHDB mailing list:
> The Red Hat Database product was end-of-life'd last year and is no
> longer supported by Red Hat. However, questions and concerns are
> still addressed by the development team at rhdb(at)sources(dot)redhat(dot)com(dot)
>
> The former RHDB development team is currently working on the
> PostgreSQL - Red Hat Edition project.
This brings me back to the oft-discussed question of marketing. If PITR, Win32, and some basic M-S replication are still on tap for 7.4, I think that more than qualifies as a major version bump. And I humbly submit that the sometimes-complacent tech press who continues to write about MySQL as if it were a real RDBMS might be more interested in version 8.0 as a Major Step Forward For PostgreSQL - along the lines of the coverage 7.0 got.
Cheers,
Ned
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ewald Geschwinde | 2003-04-14 16:12:02 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-04-14 14:43:16 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-04-14 16:40:01 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-04-14 15:17:41 | Re: Index information and log disable... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | terr | 2003-04-14 16:24:11 | Re: No merge sort? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-14 14:26:06 | Re: Recovery tools |