Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases
Date: 2017-05-06 15:49:33
Message-ID: 04e858be-fdcf-6dec-3581-932f7cb373d0@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/05/17 17:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Hmm, the 2bef06d51 and 56e19d938 are fixes for different bugs, we can
>> keep them together since result of both is corrupted snapshot, but the
>> description can't just mangle pieces of text from different commits
>> together like this as that's misleading.
>
> OK, can you suggest better wording?
>

Something like the attached (it requires some polishing of English
probably).

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
release-nodes-snapbuild.diff text/x-diff 1.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-06 16:16:43 Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-06 15:25:03 Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases