From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
Date: | 2020-04-09 07:14:01 |
Message-ID: | 04d78603-edae-9243-9dde-fe3037176a7d@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-04-09 05:39, Amit Langote wrote:
> sub_viaroot ERROR: number of columns (2601) exceeds limit (1664)
> sub_viaroot CONTEXT: slot "sub_viaroot", output plugin "pgoutput", in
> the change callback, associated LSN 0/1621010
I think the problem is that in maybe_send_schema(),
RelationClose(ancestor) releases the relcache entry, but the tuple
descriptors, which are part of the relcache entry, are still pointed to
by the tuple map.
This patch makes the tests pass for me:
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
b/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
index 5fbf2d4367..cf6e8629c1 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ maybe_send_schema(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,
/* Map must live as long as the session does. */
oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CacheMemoryContext);
- relentry->map = convert_tuples_by_name(indesc, outdesc);
+ relentry->map =
convert_tuples_by_name(CreateTupleDescCopy(indesc),
CreateTupleDescCopy(outdesc));
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldctx);
send_relation_and_attrs(ancestor, ctx);
RelationClose(ancestor);
Please check.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-04-09 07:20:13 | Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-04-09 07:11:07 | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |