Re: adding partitioned tables to publications

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date: 2020-04-09 07:14:01
Message-ID: 04d78603-edae-9243-9dde-fe3037176a7d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-04-09 05:39, Amit Langote wrote:
> sub_viaroot ERROR: number of columns (2601) exceeds limit (1664)
> sub_viaroot CONTEXT: slot "sub_viaroot", output plugin "pgoutput", in
> the change callback, associated LSN 0/1621010

I think the problem is that in maybe_send_schema(),
RelationClose(ancestor) releases the relcache entry, but the tuple
descriptors, which are part of the relcache entry, are still pointed to
by the tuple map.

This patch makes the tests pass for me:

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
b/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
index 5fbf2d4367..cf6e8629c1 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ maybe_send_schema(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,

/* Map must live as long as the session does. */
oldctx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CacheMemoryContext);
- relentry->map = convert_tuples_by_name(indesc, outdesc);
+ relentry->map =
convert_tuples_by_name(CreateTupleDescCopy(indesc),
CreateTupleDescCopy(outdesc));
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldctx);
send_relation_and_attrs(ancestor, ctx);
RelationClose(ancestor);

Please check.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-04-09 07:20:13 Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-04-09 07:11:07 Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed