Re: Index File growing big.

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index File growing big.
Date: 2003-02-27 09:03:37
Message-ID: 04d701c2de3f$1f241700$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

> > You should note that someone already has sent in a patch for
tablespaces, it
> > hasn't been acted on though - can't quite remember why. Maybe we should
> > resurrect it...
>
> It's been awhile, but my recollection is that the patch had restricted
> functionality (which would be okay for a first cut) and it invented SQL
> syntax that seemed to lock us into that restricted functionality
> permanently (not so okay). Details are fuzzy though...

Well, I'll resurrect it and see if it can be improved. Tablespaces seem to
be a requested feature these days...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lee Kindness 2003-02-27 09:08:19 Re: ecpg in REL7_3_2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-27 06:56:49 Re: Index File growing big.

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Catalin 2003-02-27 12:19:23 Daily crash
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-27 07:30:43 Re: OIDs as keys