From: | "Arnau" <arnaulist(at)andromeiberica(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Queries with timestamp II |
Date: | 2004-01-26 14:12:38 |
Message-ID: | 049101c3e416$74023120$3c0aa8c0@iberica.andromeiberica.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi all,
First of all thanks to Josh and Richard for their replies. What I have
done to test
their indications is the following. I have created a new table identical to
STATISTICS,
and an index over the TIMESTAMP_IN field.
CREATE TABLE STATISTICS2
(
STATISTIC_ID NUMERIC(10) NOT NULL DEFAULT
NEXTVAL('STATISTIC_ID_SEQ')
CONSTRAINT pk_st_statistic2_id PRIMARY KEY,
TIMESTAMP_IN TIMESTAMP,
VALUE NUMERIC(10)
);
CREATE INDEX i_stats2_tin ON STATISTICS2(TIMESTAMP_IN);
After that I inserted the data from STATISTICS and vacuumed the DB:
INSERT INTO STATISTICS2 ( SELECT * FROM STATISTICS );
vacuumdb -f -z -d test
once the vacuum has finished I do the following query
explain analyze select * from statistics2 where timestamp_in <
to_timestamp( '20031201', 'YYYYMMDD' );
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on statistics2 (cost=0.00..638.00 rows=9289 width=35) (actual
time=0.41..688.34 rows=27867 loops=1)
Total runtime: 730.82 msec
That query is not using the index. Anybody knows what I'm doing wrong?
Thank you very much
--
Arnau
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-01-26 14:38:13 | Re: Queries with timestamp II |
Previous Message | Randolf Richardson | 2004-01-26 06:35:34 | Re: Persistent Connections |