From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation |
Date: | 2019-03-29 11:58:45 |
Message-ID: | 047a38f9-58d7-3af1-3706-a5a9e2c6e264@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-20 14:42, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> But that would be factually incorrect and backwards, so it seems like a
> terrible idea, at least when it comes to manual. If you are doing it
> manually, it's a lot *easier* to do it right with the non-exclusive
> mode, because you can easily keep one psql and one shell open. And
> that's safe.
The scenario I have in mind is, a poorly maintained server, nothing
installed, can't install anything (no internet connection, license
expired), flaky network, you fear it's going to fail soon, you need to
take a backup. The simplest procedure would appear to be: start backup
mode, copy files away, stop backup mode. Anything else that involves
holding a session open over there for the whole time is way more fragile
unless proper preparations have been made (and even then). So I don't
know what you want to call that scenario, but I would feel more
comfortable having these basic tools available in a bind.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-29 11:59:02 | Re: Should the docs have a warning about pg_stat_reset()? |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2019-03-29 11:51:58 | Re: Inconsistencies in the behavior of CHR() function in PG. |